Liberalism and the general justifiability of punishment
نویسنده
چکیده
I argue that contemporary liberal theory cannot give a general justification for the institution or practice of punishment, i.e., a justification that would hold across a broad range of reasonably realistic conditions. I examine the general justifications offered by three prominent contemporary liberal theorists and show how their justifications fail in light of the possibility of an alternative to punishment. I argue that, because of their common commitments regarding the nature of justification, these theorists have decisive reasons to reject punishment in favor of a non-punitive alternative. I demonstrate the possibility of this alternative by means of a careful examination of the nature of punishment, isolating one essential characteristic—the aim to impose suffering—and showing how this characteristic need not guide enforcement. There is logical space for a forceful and coercive, yet non-punitive method of enforcement. This fact poses difficulties for many classical and contemporary justifications of punishment, but it poses particularly crippling problems for general liberal justifications.
منابع مشابه
The Passions of Punishment
I criticize an increasingly popular set of arguments for the justifiability of punishment. Some philosophers try to justify punishment by appealing to what Peter Strawson calls the reactive attitudes – emotions like resentment, indignation, remorse and guilt. These arguments fail. The view that these emotions commit us to punishment rests on unsophisticated views of punishment and of these emot...
متن کاملجایگاه اصل تناسب جرم و مجازات در حقوق کیفری ایران و انگلستان
Fitness, coherence and reconciliation between punishment and crime are the tools of a balanced criminal system. Holding a rational basis for punishment is of fundamental principles of the criminal justice system and its legitimacy factor. In penal system of Iran, at least, it has not been set general and comprehensive foundations for the proportionality of crime and punishment. The lack of fund...
متن کاملLegal Coercion , Respect & Reason - responsive Agency
1. There is a way of thinking about law that contemporary normative theorists on criminalization and legal punishment are particularly anxious about, and that way is to conceive law as involving legal coercion in the manner of threats. This way of conceiving law is unsurprising, especially when we look at criminal law; it prescribes requirements of conduct (e.g. do not murder) for which we are ...
متن کاملImpact of mental Illness on intolerance of Punishment (Cases Referred to Hamedan Forensic Medicine)
Background: The convicted mental illness is one of challenging issues in criminal law that requires the formulation of rules that require consultation with experts in the psychiatry and the use of their skills. Iran's criminal policy has ignored this issue and the consequence is that the notion of insanity in sentencing regulations remains condemned, along with some of the mental illnesses that...
متن کامل